XLF vs XLE — 26-Year Performance Comparison
Financials vs Energy — backtested 1999–2024
XLE wins$86,578 vs $46,729 on $10,000 over 26 years
XLFFinancials
Final value$46,729
CAGR+6.1%
Max drawdown-63.6%
Best year+36% (2013)
Years won14 of 26
XLEEnergy
Final value$86,578
CAGR+8.7%
Max drawdown-42.8%
Best year+64% (2022)
Years won12 of 26
Growth of $10,000
1999–2024XLFXLE
XLF$46,729
XLE$86,578
50/50 mix$76,081
50/50 blend: $76,081 (+8.1%/yr CAGR)
Splitting equally between XLF and XLE would have landed between the two — slightly lower CAGR than XLE but less volatility. Try a custom split →
Year-by-year: XLF vs XLE
| Year | XLF | XLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +30.9% | +5.4% | XLF |
| 2023 | +12.2% | +2.2% | XLF |
| 2022 | -10.5% | +64.2% | XLE |
| 2021 | +35.0% | +53.4% | XLE |
| 2020 | -1.7% | -31.8% | XLF |
| 2019 | +32.1% | +11.8% | XLF |
| 2018 | -14.6% | -18.2% | XLF |
| 2017 | +22.2% | -1.0% | XLF |
| 2016 | +22.8% | +27.4% | XLE |
| 2015 | -1.5% | -21.1% | XLF |
| 2014 | +15.2% | -7.8% | XLF |
| 2013 | +35.6% | +25.1% | XLF |
| 2012 | +29.0% | +4.6% | XLF |
| 2011 | -17.1% | +14.9% | XLE |
| 2010 | +12.1% | +20.6% | XLE |
| 2009 | +17.5% | +13.3% | XLF |
| 2008 | -55.3% | -37.6% | XLE |
| 2007 | -18.6% | +35.0% | XLE |
| 2006 | +19.1% | +24.4% | XLE |
| 2005 | +6.1% | +40.2% | XLE |
| 2004 | +10.7% | +31.4% | XLE |
| 2003 | +29.1% | +26.1% | XLF |
| 2002 | -19.0% | -10.1% | XLE |
| 2001 | -6.3% | -8.1% | XLF |
| 2000 | +26.2% | +5.1% | XLF |
| 1999 | +16.0% | +28.4% | XLE |
More comparisons
Build your portfolio
Mix XLF + XLE with custom allocations
Try a 70/30 or 40/60 split — or add up to 3 more ETFs. See exactly how your custom portfolio would have performed.
Open Portfolio Builder →Past performance does not guarantee future results.