Lubbock vs Missoula for Retirees (2026)

Better for retirees: Lubbock~16% cheaper overall
Median Home Price
$210K
Lubbock
$430K
Missoula
State Income Tax
None
Lubbock
6.8%
Missoula
Est. Healthcare / month
$405
Lubbock
$485
Missoula
Walk Score (0–100)
24
Lubbock
42
Missoula

Scroll down for retirement income tax breakdown, healthcare estimates, and FAQ.

Full retirement cost breakdown

Metric
Lubbock
Texas
Missoula
Montana
1BR rent / month$1,000Better$1,300
Median home price$210KBetter$430K
State income taxNoneBetter6.8%
Sales tax (combined)8.3%0%Better
Monthly utilities$172$145Better
Groceries index (US = 100)91Better99
Est. healthcare / month$405Better$485
Walk score (0–100)24 / 10042 / 100Better
Overall COL index (100 = US avg)81Better97

Frequently asked questions

Which city is better for retirement — Lubbock or Missoula?

Based on home prices, taxes on retirement income, walkability, and overall cost of living, Lubbock scores better for retirees. Median home prices are $210K in Lubbock vs $430K in Missoula. Lubbock is approximately 16% cheaper overall. The best choice still depends on climate, healthcare access, and proximity to family.

Is retirement income taxed in Lubbock or Missoula?

Texas has no state income tax, meaning Social Security, pension, and retirement account withdrawals are not subject to state tax. Montana has a 6.8% state income tax rate. For retirees, this difference can save thousands annually.

What is the estimated monthly healthcare cost in Lubbock vs Missoula?

Based on national average retiree healthcare spending (~$500/month) scaled by each city's cost-of-living index, estimated monthly healthcare costs are approximately $405 in Lubbock and $485 in Missoula. That's a difference of ~$80/month, or ~$960/year. Actual costs vary based on your Medicare plan, supplements, and health needs.

Can I afford to retire in Lubbock on a $50,000 annual income?

On a $50,000/year ($4,167/month) retirement income in Lubbock, rent alone would consume approximately 24% of your budget (1BR rent ~$1,000/mo) and healthcare another ~10%. That leaves roughly 66% (~$2,750/mo) for groceries, transportation, and other expenses. This is generally considered manageable.

Which city is more walkable for retirees?

Missoula has a higher walk score (42 vs 24 out of 100). Walkability is increasingly important for retirees who want to reduce car dependence — a score above 70 means most daily errands can be done on foot. Missoula offers more independence without a car, which also reduces transportation costs.

Retirement purchasing power

$50K/year in Lubbock has the same purchasing power as $60K/year in Missoula

Related comparisons

Healthcare estimates based on national avg retiree spending (~$500/mo) scaled by COL index · State income tax rates from Tax Foundation · Data: Zillow, BLS, Numbeo · Q1 2026