XLF vs VTI — 24-Year Performance Comparison
Financials vs Total US Market — backtested 2001–2024
VTI wins$73,022 vs $31,920 on $10,000 over 24 years
XLFFinancials
Final value$31,920
CAGR+5.0%
Max drawdown-63.6%
Best year+36% (2013)
Years won13 of 24
VTITotal US Market
Final value$73,022
CAGR+8.6%
Max drawdown-37.0%
Best year+34% (2013)
Years won11 of 24
Growth of $10,000
2001–2024XLFVTI
XLF$31,920
VTI$73,022
50/50 mix$50,411
50/50 blend: $50,411 (+7.0%/yr CAGR)
Splitting equally between XLF and VTI would have landed between the two — slightly lower CAGR than VTI but less volatility. Try a custom split →
Year-by-year: XLF vs VTI
| Year | XLF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +30.9% | +23.8% | XLF |
| 2023 | +12.2% | +26.1% | VTI |
| 2022 | -10.5% | -19.5% | XLF |
| 2021 | +35.0% | +25.7% | XLF |
| 2020 | -1.7% | +21.1% | VTI |
| 2019 | +32.1% | +30.7% | XLF |
| 2018 | -14.6% | -5.2% | VTI |
| 2017 | +22.2% | +21.2% | XLF |
| 2016 | +22.8% | +12.7% | XLF |
| 2015 | -1.5% | +0.4% | VTI |
| 2014 | +15.2% | +12.6% | XLF |
| 2013 | +35.6% | +33.5% | XLF |
| 2012 | +29.0% | +16.4% | XLF |
| 2011 | -17.1% | +1.1% | VTI |
| 2010 | +12.1% | +17.3% | VTI |
| 2009 | +17.5% | +28.8% | VTI |
| 2008 | -55.3% | -37.0% | VTI |
| 2007 | -18.6% | +5.5% | VTI |
| 2006 | +19.1% | +15.7% | XLF |
| 2005 | +6.1% | +5.9% | XLF |
| 2004 | +10.7% | +12.5% | VTI |
| 2003 | +29.1% | +31.4% | VTI |
| 2002 | -19.0% | -21.5% | XLF |
| 2001 | -6.3% | -11.0% | XLF |
More comparisons
Build your portfolio
Mix XLF + VTI with custom allocations
Try a 70/30 or 40/60 split — or add up to 3 more ETFs. See exactly how your custom portfolio would have performed.
Open Portfolio Builder →Past performance does not guarantee future results.