St. Paul vs Scottsdale for Retirees (2026)

Better for retirees: St. Paul~17% cheaper overall
Median Home Price
$310K
St. Paul
$650K
Scottsdale
State Income Tax
9.9%
St. Paul
2.5%
Scottsdale
Est. Healthcare / month
$485
St. Paul
$585
Scottsdale
Walk Score (0–100)
67
St. Paul
40
Scottsdale

Scroll down for retirement income tax breakdown, healthcare estimates, and FAQ.

Full retirement cost breakdown

Metric
St. Paul
Minnesota
Scottsdale
Arizona
1BR rent / month$1,500Better$2,000
Median home price$310KBetter$650K
State income tax9.9%2.5%Better
Sales tax (combined)8%Better8.6%
Monthly utilities$195Better$215
Groceries index (US = 100)101Better104
Est. healthcare / month$485Better$585
Walk score (0–100)67 / 100Better40 / 100
Overall COL index (100 = US avg)97Better117

Frequently asked questions

Which city is better for retirement — St. Paul or Scottsdale?

Based on home prices, taxes on retirement income, walkability, and overall cost of living, St. Paul scores better for retirees. Median home prices are $310K in St. Paul vs $650K in Scottsdale. St. Paul is approximately 17% cheaper overall. The best choice still depends on climate, healthcare access, and proximity to family.

Is retirement income taxed in St. Paul or Scottsdale?

Scottsdale has the lower state income tax rate (2.5% vs 9.9%). Note that many states exempt Social Security income and some pension income from state taxes even when other income is taxed — check your specific state's retirement tax rules.

What is the estimated monthly healthcare cost in St. Paul vs Scottsdale?

Based on national average retiree healthcare spending (~$500/month) scaled by each city's cost-of-living index, estimated monthly healthcare costs are approximately $485 in St. Paul and $585 in Scottsdale. That's a difference of ~$100/month, or ~$1,200/year. Actual costs vary based on your Medicare plan, supplements, and health needs.

Can I afford to retire in St. Paul on a $50,000 annual income?

On a $50,000/year ($4,167/month) retirement income in St. Paul, rent alone would consume approximately 36% of your budget (1BR rent ~$1,500/mo) and healthcare another ~12%. That leaves roughly 52% (~$2,167/mo) for groceries, transportation, and other expenses. This is tight — a studio apartment or lower-cost neighborhood would help.

Which city is more walkable for retirees?

St. Paul has a higher walk score (67 vs 40 out of 100). Walkability is increasingly important for retirees who want to reduce car dependence — a score above 70 means most daily errands can be done on foot. St. Paul offers more independence without a car, which also reduces transportation costs.

Retirement purchasing power

$50K/year in St. Paul has the same purchasing power as $60K/year in Scottsdale

Related comparisons

Healthcare estimates based on national avg retiree spending (~$500/mo) scaled by COL index · State income tax rates from Tax Foundation · Data: Zillow, BLS, Numbeo · Q1 2026