Missoula vs Bakersfield for Retirees (2026)

Better for retirees: Missoula
Median Home Price
$430K
Missoula
$330K
Bakersfield
State Income Tax
6.8%
Missoula
9.3%
Bakersfield
Est. Healthcare / month
$485
Missoula
$485
Bakersfield
Walk Score (0–100)
42
Missoula
26
Bakersfield

Scroll down for retirement income tax breakdown, healthcare estimates, and FAQ.

Full retirement cost breakdown

Metric
Missoula
Montana
Bakersfield
California
1BR rent / month$1,300Better$1,300
Median home price$430K$330KBetter
State income tax6.8%Better9.3%
Sales tax (combined)0%Better8%
Monthly utilities$145$140Better
Groceries index (US = 100)9998Better
Est. healthcare / month$485Better$485
Walk score (0–100)42 / 100Better26 / 100
Overall COL index (100 = US avg)97Better97

Frequently asked questions

Which city is better for retirement — Missoula or Bakersfield?

Based on home prices, taxes on retirement income, walkability, and overall cost of living, Missoula scores better for retirees. Median home prices are $430K in Missoula vs $330K in Bakersfield. The best choice still depends on climate, healthcare access, and proximity to family.

Is retirement income taxed in Missoula or Bakersfield?

Missoula has the lower state income tax rate (6.8% vs 9.3%). Note that many states exempt Social Security income and some pension income from state taxes even when other income is taxed — check your specific state's retirement tax rules.

What is the estimated monthly healthcare cost in Missoula vs Bakersfield?

Based on national average retiree healthcare spending (~$500/month) scaled by each city's cost-of-living index, estimated monthly healthcare costs are approximately $485 in Missoula and $485 in Bakersfield. That's a difference of ~$0/month, or ~$0/year. Actual costs vary based on your Medicare plan, supplements, and health needs.

Can I afford to retire in Missoula on a $50,000 annual income?

On a $50,000/year ($4,167/month) retirement income in Missoula, rent alone would consume approximately 31% of your budget (1BR rent ~$1,300/mo) and healthcare another ~12%. That leaves roughly 57% (~$2,375/mo) for groceries, transportation, and other expenses. This is tight — a studio apartment or lower-cost neighborhood would help.

Which city is more walkable for retirees?

Missoula has a higher walk score (42 vs 26 out of 100). Walkability is increasingly important for retirees who want to reduce car dependence — a score above 70 means most daily errands can be done on foot. Missoula offers more independence without a car, which also reduces transportation costs.

Retirement purchasing power

$50K/year in Missoula has the same purchasing power as $50K/year in Bakersfield

Related comparisons

Healthcare estimates based on national avg retiree spending (~$500/mo) scaled by COL index · State income tax rates from Tax Foundation · Data: Zillow, BLS, Numbeo · Q1 2026