Chicago vs San Francisco for Retirees (2026)

Better for retirees: Chicago~45% cheaper overall
Median Home Price
$360K
Chicago
$1.2M
San Francisco
State Income Tax
4.9%
Chicago
9.3%
San Francisco
Est. Healthcare / month
$535
Chicago
$970
San Francisco
Walk Score (0–100)
78
Chicago
87
San Francisco

Scroll down for retirement income tax breakdown, healthcare estimates, and FAQ.

Full retirement cost breakdown

Metric
Chicago
Illinois
San Francisco
California
1BR rent / month$1,900Better$3,600
Median home price$360KBetter$1.2M
State income tax4.9%Better9.3%
Sales tax (combined)10.3%8.6%Better
Monthly utilities$165$160Better
Groceries index (US = 100)102Better118
Est. healthcare / month$535Better$970
Walk score (0–100)78 / 10087 / 100Better
Overall COL index (100 = US avg)107Better194

Frequently asked questions

Which city is better for retirement — Chicago or San Francisco?

Based on home prices, taxes on retirement income, walkability, and overall cost of living, Chicago scores better for retirees. Median home prices are $360K in Chicago vs $1.2M in San Francisco. Chicago is approximately 45% cheaper overall. The best choice still depends on climate, healthcare access, and proximity to family.

Is retirement income taxed in Chicago or San Francisco?

Chicago has the lower state income tax rate (4.9% vs 9.3%). Note that many states exempt Social Security income and some pension income from state taxes even when other income is taxed — check your specific state's retirement tax rules.

What is the estimated monthly healthcare cost in Chicago vs San Francisco?

Based on national average retiree healthcare spending (~$500/month) scaled by each city's cost-of-living index, estimated monthly healthcare costs are approximately $535 in Chicago and $970 in San Francisco. That's a difference of ~$435/month, or ~$5,220/year. Actual costs vary based on your Medicare plan, supplements, and health needs.

Can I afford to retire in Chicago on a $50,000 annual income?

On a $50,000/year ($4,167/month) retirement income in Chicago, rent alone would consume approximately 46% of your budget (1BR rent ~$1,900/mo) and healthcare another ~13%. That leaves roughly 41% (~$1,708/mo) for groceries, transportation, and other expenses. This is tight — a studio apartment or lower-cost neighborhood would help.

Which city is more walkable for retirees?

San Francisco has a higher walk score (87 vs 78 out of 100). Walkability is increasingly important for retirees who want to reduce car dependence — a score above 70 means most daily errands can be done on foot. San Francisco offers more independence without a car, which also reduces transportation costs.

Retirement purchasing power

$50K/year in Chicago has the same purchasing power as $91K/year in San Francisco

Related comparisons

Healthcare estimates based on national avg retiree spending (~$500/mo) scaled by COL index · State income tax rates from Tax Foundation · Data: Zillow, BLS, Numbeo · Q1 2026