$80K in Worcester = $78,519 in Minneapolis

Your $80K salary in Worcester (COL 108) has the same purchasing power as $78,519 in Minneapolis (COL 106). Minneapolis is cheaper โ€” your money goes 2% further there.

$80K in Worcester, MA
$4,723/mo take-home
Rent: $1,750/mo (37% of take-home)
Tight
$78,519/yr in Minneapolis, MN
$4,315/mo take-home
Rent: $1,700/mo (39% of take-home)
Tight

Budget breakdown โ€” $80K in both cities

What $80K actually buys you in each city after taxes and core expenses.

Expense
Worcester
$80K
Minneapolis
$80K (same salary)
Monthly take-home$4,723$4,397
1BR rent$1,750$1,700
Groceries$403$391
Transport$78$95
Utilities$190$195
Internet$68$65
Left after essentials$2,234/month$1,951/month
To match your Worcester purchasing power in Minneapolis, you'd need to earn $78,519/year (2% less than $80K). At that salary, you'd have $1,869/mo left after essentials โ€” vs $2,234/mo in Worcester.

Frequently asked questions

What is $80K in Worcester equivalent to in Minneapolis?

$80K in Worcester (COL index 108) has the same purchasing power as $78,519 in Minneapolis (COL index 106). That's 2% less than your current salary.

If I move from Worcester to Minneapolis keeping my $80K salary, will I be better off?

Yes. If you keep earning $80K after moving to Minneapolis, you'd have $-283 more per month after core expenses โ€” because Minneapolis is cheaper than Worcester.

How is the salary equivalent calculated?

The equivalent salary is calculated by multiplying your current salary by the ratio of the two cities' overall cost of living indices: $80K ร— (106 รท 108) = $78,519. This adjusts for differences in housing, food, transport, and general cost of living.

Equivalency uses overall COL index ratio. Take-home uses simplified federal/state brackets. Zillow ยท BLS ยท Numbeo ยท Q1 2026 ยท For general guidance only