$100K in Minneapolis = $101,887 in Worcester

Your $100K salary in Minneapolis (COL 106) has the same purchasing power as $101,887 in Worcester (COL 108). Worcester is more expensive โ€” you'd need 2% more to maintain the same lifestyle.

$100K in Minneapolis, MN
$5,496/mo take-home
Rent: $1,700/mo (31% of take-home)
Manageable
$101,887/yr in Worcester, MA
$5,650/mo take-home
Rent: $1,750/mo (31% of take-home)
Manageable

Budget breakdown โ€” $100K in both cities

What $100K actually buys you in each city after taxes and core expenses.

Expense
Minneapolis
$100K
Worcester
$100K (same salary)
Monthly take-home$5,496$5,904
1BR rent$1,700$1,750
Groceries$391$403
Transport$95$78
Utilities$195$190
Internet$65$68
Left after essentials$3,050/month$3,415/month
To match your Minneapolis purchasing power in Worcester, you'd need to earn $101,887/year (2% more than $100K). At that salary, you'd have $3,161/mo left after essentials โ€” vs $3,050/mo in Minneapolis.

Frequently asked questions

What is $100K in Minneapolis equivalent to in Worcester?

$100K in Minneapolis (COL index 106) has the same purchasing power as $101,887 in Worcester (COL index 108). That's 2% more than your current salary.

If I move from Minneapolis to Worcester keeping my $100K salary, will I be better off?

Not necessarily. Core expenses in Worcester are higher, so on the same $100K salary you'd have $365 less per month. You'd need to earn $101,887 to maintain the same standard of living.

How is the salary equivalent calculated?

The equivalent salary is calculated by multiplying your current salary by the ratio of the two cities' overall cost of living indices: $100K ร— (108 รท 106) = $101,887. This adjusts for differences in housing, food, transport, and general cost of living.

Equivalency uses overall COL index ratio. Take-home uses simplified federal/state brackets. Zillow ยท BLS ยท Numbeo ยท Q1 2026 ยท For general guidance only