Worcester vs Colorado Springs for Retirees (2026)

Median Home Price
$380K
Worcester
$400K
Colorado Springs
State Income Tax
5%
Worcester
4.4%
Colorado Springs
Est. Healthcare / month
$540
Worcester
$475
Colorado Springs
Walk Score (0–100)
63
Worcester
30
Colorado Springs

Scroll down for retirement income tax breakdown, healthcare estimates, and FAQ.

Full retirement cost breakdown

Metric
Worcester
Massachusetts
Colorado Springs
Colorado
1BR rent / month$1,750$1,500Better
Median home price$380KBetter$400K
State income tax5%4.4%Better
Sales tax (combined)6.3%Better8%
Monthly utilities$190$145Better
Groceries index (US = 100)10698Better
Est. healthcare / month$540$475Better
Walk score (0–100)63 / 100Better30 / 100
Overall COL index (100 = US avg)10895Better

Frequently asked questions

Which city is better for retirement — Worcester or Colorado Springs?

Worcester and Colorado Springs are closely matched for retirees. Housing costs, tax burden, and overall affordability are similar. Your specific priorities — climate, walkability, family proximity — should guide the decision.

Is retirement income taxed in Worcester or Colorado Springs?

Colorado Springs has the lower state income tax rate (4.4% vs 5%). Note that many states exempt Social Security income and some pension income from state taxes even when other income is taxed — check your specific state's retirement tax rules.

What is the estimated monthly healthcare cost in Worcester vs Colorado Springs?

Based on national average retiree healthcare spending (~$500/month) scaled by each city's cost-of-living index, estimated monthly healthcare costs are approximately $540 in Worcester and $475 in Colorado Springs. That's a difference of ~$65/month, or ~$780/year. Actual costs vary based on your Medicare plan, supplements, and health needs.

Can I afford to retire in Worcester on a $50,000 annual income?

On a $50,000/year ($4,167/month) retirement income in Worcester, rent alone would consume approximately 42% of your budget (1BR rent ~$1,750/mo) and healthcare another ~13%. That leaves roughly 45% (~$1,875/mo) for groceries, transportation, and other expenses. This is tight — a studio apartment or lower-cost neighborhood would help.

Which city is more walkable for retirees?

Worcester has a higher walk score (63 vs 30 out of 100). Walkability is increasingly important for retirees who want to reduce car dependence — a score above 70 means most daily errands can be done on foot. Worcester offers more independence without a car, which also reduces transportation costs.

Retirement purchasing power

$50K/year in Worcester has the same purchasing power as $44K/year in Colorado Springs

Related comparisons

Healthcare estimates based on national avg retiree spending (~$500/mo) scaled by COL index · State income tax rates from Tax Foundation · Data: Zillow, BLS, Numbeo · Q1 2026