St. Paul vs Waco for Retirees (2026)

Better for retirees: Waco~14% cheaper overall
Median Home Price
$310K
St. Paul
$210K
Waco
State Income Tax
9.9%
St. Paul
None
Waco
Est. Healthcare / month
$485
St. Paul
$415
Waco
Walk Score (0–100)
67
St. Paul
22
Waco

Scroll down for retirement income tax breakdown, healthcare estimates, and FAQ.

Full retirement cost breakdown

Metric
St. Paul
Minnesota
Waco
Texas
1BR rent / month$1,500$1,000Better
Median home price$310K$210KBetter
State income tax9.9%NoneBetter
Sales tax (combined)8%Better8.3%
Monthly utilities$195$172Better
Groceries index (US = 100)10192Better
Est. healthcare / month$485$415Better
Walk score (0–100)67 / 100Better22 / 100
Overall COL index (100 = US avg)9783Better

Frequently asked questions

Which city is better for retirement — St. Paul or Waco?

Based on home prices, taxes on retirement income, walkability, and overall cost of living, Waco scores better for retirees. Median home prices are $310K in St. Paul vs $210K in Waco. Waco is approximately 14% cheaper overall. The best choice still depends on climate, healthcare access, and proximity to family.

Is retirement income taxed in St. Paul or Waco?

Texas has no state income tax, meaning Social Security, pension, and retirement account withdrawals are not subject to state tax. Minnesota has a 9.9% state income tax rate. For retirees, this difference can save thousands annually.

What is the estimated monthly healthcare cost in St. Paul vs Waco?

Based on national average retiree healthcare spending (~$500/month) scaled by each city's cost-of-living index, estimated monthly healthcare costs are approximately $485 in St. Paul and $415 in Waco. That's a difference of ~$70/month, or ~$840/year. Actual costs vary based on your Medicare plan, supplements, and health needs.

Can I afford to retire in St. Paul on a $50,000 annual income?

On a $50,000/year ($4,167/month) retirement income in St. Paul, rent alone would consume approximately 36% of your budget (1BR rent ~$1,500/mo) and healthcare another ~12%. That leaves roughly 52% (~$2,167/mo) for groceries, transportation, and other expenses. This is tight — a studio apartment or lower-cost neighborhood would help.

Which city is more walkable for retirees?

St. Paul has a higher walk score (67 vs 22 out of 100). Walkability is increasingly important for retirees who want to reduce car dependence — a score above 70 means most daily errands can be done on foot. St. Paul offers more independence without a car, which also reduces transportation costs.

Retirement purchasing power

$50K/year in St. Paul has the same purchasing power as $43K/year in Waco

Related comparisons

Healthcare estimates based on national avg retiree spending (~$500/mo) scaled by COL index · State income tax rates from Tax Foundation · Data: Zillow, BLS, Numbeo · Q1 2026