St. Paul vs Tulsa for Retirees (2026)

Better for retirees: Tulsa~16% cheaper overall
Median Home Price
$310K
St. Paul
$215K
Tulsa
State Income Tax
9.9%
St. Paul
4.8%
Tulsa
Est. Healthcare / month
$485
St. Paul
$405
Tulsa
Walk Score (0–100)
67
St. Paul
28
Tulsa

Scroll down for retirement income tax breakdown, healthcare estimates, and FAQ.

Full retirement cost breakdown

Metric
St. Paul
Minnesota
Tulsa
Oklahoma
1BR rent / month$1,500$1,050Better
Median home price$310K$215KBetter
State income tax9.9%4.8%Better
Sales tax (combined)8%Better8.9%
Monthly utilities$195$172Better
Groceries index (US = 100)10192Better
Est. healthcare / month$485$405Better
Walk score (0–100)67 / 100Better28 / 100
Overall COL index (100 = US avg)9781Better

Frequently asked questions

Which city is better for retirement — St. Paul or Tulsa?

Based on home prices, taxes on retirement income, walkability, and overall cost of living, Tulsa scores better for retirees. Median home prices are $310K in St. Paul vs $215K in Tulsa. Tulsa is approximately 16% cheaper overall. The best choice still depends on climate, healthcare access, and proximity to family.

Is retirement income taxed in St. Paul or Tulsa?

Tulsa has the lower state income tax rate (4.8% vs 9.9%). Note that many states exempt Social Security income and some pension income from state taxes even when other income is taxed — check your specific state's retirement tax rules.

What is the estimated monthly healthcare cost in St. Paul vs Tulsa?

Based on national average retiree healthcare spending (~$500/month) scaled by each city's cost-of-living index, estimated monthly healthcare costs are approximately $485 in St. Paul and $405 in Tulsa. That's a difference of ~$80/month, or ~$960/year. Actual costs vary based on your Medicare plan, supplements, and health needs.

Can I afford to retire in St. Paul on a $50,000 annual income?

On a $50,000/year ($4,167/month) retirement income in St. Paul, rent alone would consume approximately 36% of your budget (1BR rent ~$1,500/mo) and healthcare another ~12%. That leaves roughly 52% (~$2,167/mo) for groceries, transportation, and other expenses. This is tight — a studio apartment or lower-cost neighborhood would help.

Which city is more walkable for retirees?

St. Paul has a higher walk score (67 vs 28 out of 100). Walkability is increasingly important for retirees who want to reduce car dependence — a score above 70 means most daily errands can be done on foot. St. Paul offers more independence without a car, which also reduces transportation costs.

Retirement purchasing power

$50K/year in St. Paul has the same purchasing power as $42K/year in Tulsa

Related comparisons

Healthcare estimates based on national avg retiree spending (~$500/mo) scaled by COL index · State income tax rates from Tax Foundation · Data: Zillow, BLS, Numbeo · Q1 2026