Roanoke vs Missoula for Retirees (2026)

Better for retirees: Roanoke~10% cheaper overall
Median Home Price
$240K
Roanoke
$430K
Missoula
State Income Tax
5.8%
Roanoke
6.8%
Missoula
Est. Healthcare / month
$435
Roanoke
$485
Missoula
Walk Score (0–100)
38
Roanoke
42
Missoula

Scroll down for retirement income tax breakdown, healthcare estimates, and FAQ.

Full retirement cost breakdown

Metric
Roanoke
Virginia
Missoula
Montana
1BR rent / month$1,200Better$1,300
Median home price$240KBetter$430K
State income tax5.8%Better6.8%
Sales tax (combined)5.5%0%Better
Monthly utilities$155$145Better
Groceries index (US = 100)95Better99
Est. healthcare / month$435Better$485
Walk score (0–100)38 / 10042 / 100Better
Overall COL index (100 = US avg)87Better97

Frequently asked questions

Which city is better for retirement — Roanoke or Missoula?

Based on home prices, taxes on retirement income, walkability, and overall cost of living, Roanoke scores better for retirees. Median home prices are $240K in Roanoke vs $430K in Missoula. Roanoke is approximately 10% cheaper overall. The best choice still depends on climate, healthcare access, and proximity to family.

Is retirement income taxed in Roanoke or Missoula?

Roanoke has the lower state income tax rate (5.8% vs 6.8%). Note that many states exempt Social Security income and some pension income from state taxes even when other income is taxed — check your specific state's retirement tax rules.

What is the estimated monthly healthcare cost in Roanoke vs Missoula?

Based on national average retiree healthcare spending (~$500/month) scaled by each city's cost-of-living index, estimated monthly healthcare costs are approximately $435 in Roanoke and $485 in Missoula. That's a difference of ~$50/month, or ~$600/year. Actual costs vary based on your Medicare plan, supplements, and health needs.

Can I afford to retire in Roanoke on a $50,000 annual income?

On a $50,000/year ($4,167/month) retirement income in Roanoke, rent alone would consume approximately 29% of your budget (1BR rent ~$1,200/mo) and healthcare another ~10%. That leaves roughly 61% (~$2,542/mo) for groceries, transportation, and other expenses. This is generally considered manageable.

Which city is more walkable for retirees?

Missoula has a higher walk score (42 vs 38 out of 100). Walkability is increasingly important for retirees who want to reduce car dependence — a score above 70 means most daily errands can be done on foot. Missoula offers more independence without a car, which also reduces transportation costs.

Retirement purchasing power

$50K/year in Roanoke has the same purchasing power as $56K/year in Missoula

Related comparisons

Healthcare estimates based on national avg retiree spending (~$500/mo) scaled by COL index · State income tax rates from Tax Foundation · Data: Zillow, BLS, Numbeo · Q1 2026