Missoula vs Irvine for Retirees (2026)

Better for retirees: Missoula~39% cheaper overall
Median Home Price
$430K
Missoula
$950K
Irvine
State Income Tax
6.8%
Missoula
9.3%
Irvine
Est. Healthcare / month
$485
Missoula
$790
Irvine
Walk Score (0–100)
42
Missoula
42
Irvine

Scroll down for retirement income tax breakdown, healthcare estimates, and FAQ.

Full retirement cost breakdown

Metric
Missoula
Montana
Irvine
California
1BR rent / month$1,300Better$2,800
Median home price$430KBetter$950K
State income tax6.8%Better9.3%
Sales tax (combined)0%Better7.8%
Monthly utilities$145Better$148
Groceries index (US = 100)99Better113
Est. healthcare / month$485Better$790
Walk score (0–100)42 / 100Better42 / 100
Overall COL index (100 = US avg)97Better158

Frequently asked questions

Which city is better for retirement — Missoula or Irvine?

Based on home prices, taxes on retirement income, walkability, and overall cost of living, Missoula scores better for retirees. Median home prices are $430K in Missoula vs $950K in Irvine. Missoula is approximately 39% cheaper overall. The best choice still depends on climate, healthcare access, and proximity to family.

Is retirement income taxed in Missoula or Irvine?

Missoula has the lower state income tax rate (6.8% vs 9.3%). Note that many states exempt Social Security income and some pension income from state taxes even when other income is taxed — check your specific state's retirement tax rules.

What is the estimated monthly healthcare cost in Missoula vs Irvine?

Based on national average retiree healthcare spending (~$500/month) scaled by each city's cost-of-living index, estimated monthly healthcare costs are approximately $485 in Missoula and $790 in Irvine. That's a difference of ~$305/month, or ~$3,660/year. Actual costs vary based on your Medicare plan, supplements, and health needs.

Can I afford to retire in Missoula on a $50,000 annual income?

On a $50,000/year ($4,167/month) retirement income in Missoula, rent alone would consume approximately 31% of your budget (1BR rent ~$1,300/mo) and healthcare another ~12%. That leaves roughly 57% (~$2,375/mo) for groceries, transportation, and other expenses. This is tight — a studio apartment or lower-cost neighborhood would help.

Which city is more walkable for retirees?

Missoula has a higher walk score (42 vs 42 out of 100). Walkability is increasingly important for retirees who want to reduce car dependence — a score above 70 means most daily errands can be done on foot. Missoula offers more independence without a car, which also reduces transportation costs.

Retirement purchasing power

$50K/year in Missoula has the same purchasing power as $81K/year in Irvine

Related comparisons

Healthcare estimates based on national avg retiree spending (~$500/mo) scaled by COL index · State income tax rates from Tax Foundation · Data: Zillow, BLS, Numbeo · Q1 2026